Comparison
Amp vs Kiro
| Amp | Kiro | |
|---|---|---|
| What it says it does | AmpAmp is a coding agent and development environment built for the frontier. You can build anything in Amp, in orbs that let you run the agent without supervision from anywhere, or on your own machine with our CLI and runner. | KiroKiro helps developers and teams do their best work: turn prompts into executable specs, validate code correctness to find bugs unit tests miss, and build across large codebases with parallel agents that learn from every session. |
| Pricing | AmpHobby free (pay as you go for Amp-hosted orbs, unlimited self-hosted orbs, bring your own ChatGPT/Claude subscriptions or API keys with no Amp token fees); Individual $20/mo (45,000 minutes of hosted orb time, unlimited public/private repositories, your own domains for portals); Teams no extra charge (shared billing and pooled credits, SSO); Enterprise custom (official) | KiroFree plan $0/mo with 50 credits; Pro $20/user/mo (1,000 credits), Pro+ $40 (2,000), Pro Max $100 (5,000), Power $200 (10,000); add-on credits $0.04 each on paid plans (official) |
| Website | Amphttps://ampcode.com/ | Kirohttps://kiro.dev/ |
Which tool for which job
Amp wins when you want an agent that can keep working unattended and you already pay for a model subscription.
Kiro wins when you want spec-first agent coding with a free tier and clear credit pricing, or you are moving off Amazon Q Developer's IDE plugins.
Descriptions in the table come from each vendor's own site. This verdict is a fit call from those official pages as of 4 November 2026, not a shared benchmark or a hands-on score. Prices change, so confirm the pricing row on each tool page. How we review tools.
Keep exploring
The Tool Chest newsletter
New AI tools for game devs, one deep dive and zero fluff. Every week.