Comparison
Cursor vs OpenCode
| Cursor | OpenCode | |
|---|---|---|
| What it says it does | CursorBuilt to make you extraordinarily productive, agents turn ideas into code. Accelerate development by handing off tasks to Cursor. | OpenCodeOpenCode is an open source AI coding agent for your terminal, IDE or desktop. Use its included free models, sign in with GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT Plus/Pro, or connect 75+ model providers including local models. |
| Pricing | CursorFree $0/mo; Plus $8/mo; Premium $30/mo; Super $100/mo; Ultra $200/mo; Teams from $30/user/mo. Third-party model usage billed separately at API list price on Premium and above (official) | OpenCodeFree and open source, with some free models included; optional OpenCode Go subscription: Go $10/mo, Go Plus $40/mo, Go Teams $20/member/mo; other providers billed by them (official) |
| Website | Cursorhttps://cursor.com/ | OpenCodehttps://opencode.ai/ |
Which tool for which job
Cursor wins when you need an AI coding agent in your editor or cloud for game and tooling code, not a full AI game engine.
OpenCode wins when you want Claude Code-style agent coding but with any model, or on a tight budget.
Descriptions in the table come from each vendor's own site. This verdict is a fit call from those official pages as of 19 October 2026, not a shared benchmark or a hands-on score. Prices change, so confirm the pricing row on each tool page. How we review tools.
Keep exploring
The Tool Chest newsletter
New AI tools for game devs, one deep dive and zero fluff. Every week.