Comparison
Augment Code vs Cursor
| Augment Code | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| What it says it does | Augment CodeAugment Code is an AI coding platform with agents and a context engine built for large codebases, plus Cosmos for running agents across an engineering organization. | CursorBuilt to make you extraordinarily productive, agents turn ideas into code. Accelerate development by handing off tasks to Cursor. |
| Pricing | Augment CodeStandard $20/mo flat (up to 50 seats, $20 of usage included); Business $100/mo flat ($100 of usage included); Enterprise custom; pay-as-you-go top-ups for extra usage (official) | CursorFree $0/mo; Plus $8/mo; Premium $30/mo; Super $100/mo; Ultra $200/mo; Teams from $30/user/mo. Third-party model usage billed separately at API list price on Premium and above (official) |
| Website | Augment Codehttps://www.augmentcode.com/ | Cursorhttps://cursor.com/ |
Which tool for which job
Augment Code wins when your codebase is big enough that context matters more than raw editor features.
Cursor wins when you need an AI coding agent in your editor or cloud for game and tooling code, not a full AI game engine.
Descriptions in the table come from each vendor's own site. This verdict is a fit call from those official pages as of 29 October 2026, not a shared benchmark or a hands-on score. Prices change, so confirm the pricing row on each tool page. How we review tools.
Keep exploring
- Augment Code listing
- Cursor listing
- All Code & Engines tools
- Best AI tools for game coding and engines
The Tool Chest newsletter
New AI tools for game devs, one deep dive and zero fluff. Every week.