Comparison
Kilo Code vs LootLocker
| Kilo Code | LootLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| What it says it does | Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, and Cloud. 500+ models at zero markup, your own keys, or local models for privacy. | LootLockerThe player platform behind every game you ship. Connect with your players, engage them, and reward them for sticking around. A managed game backend for player accounts, progression and rewards. |
| Pricing | Kilo CodeFree and open source for individuals (AI usage billed separately; free models, local models or bring your own keys at $0); Teams $15/user/mo (14-day Enterprise trial); Enterprise custom (SSO, audit logs, SLA) (official) | LootLockerPersonal free (under $100,000 combined revenue + funding, 10,000 MAU limit, non-console platforms); Pro $500/mo (30-day free trial, card required; 10,000 MAU included then $0.015 per extra MAU; console platforms); Publisher custom; annual billing saves 10% (official) |
| Website | Kilo Codehttps://kilo.ai/ | LootLockerhttps://lootlocker.com/ |
Which tool for which job
Kilo Code wins when you want a free agent that runs in JetBrains IDEs or with local models.
LootLocker wins when you qualify for the free Personal plan or need a managed backend with console support.
Descriptions in the table come from each vendor's own site. This verdict is a fit call from those official pages as of 29 October 2026, not a shared benchmark or a hands-on score. Prices change, so confirm the pricing row on each tool page. How we review tools.
Keep exploring
The Tool Chest newsletter
New AI tools for game devs, one deep dive and zero fluff. Every week.